Are you feeling disappointed or letdown after seeing the movie? This is the forum to express your opinions about why you feel that way.

Please remember each TwilightMOM only gets one post on the entire Review Forum. We are not allowing any replies or comments. You can go back and edit your one post if you want to add something.

Umm...wow.....

With all due respect and with absolutely no intent to blow anyone's buzz.....

I don't think I saw the same movie as most of you in the other threads. I thought it was dreadful. If someone watches this film who has NOT read the book, I see no way that person could possibly understand what was going on (this, coming from someone who has read the book twice).

There was no respect for the source material. None whatsoever. It's one thing to make a movie that deviates from the book due to time/budget constraints, but at least movies like Harry Potter show respect for the source when they deviate from the book.

ZERO character development. JASPER? Are you KIDDING? The made him look like some kind of drug addict with NO explanation of his abilities. There was no narrative in a cinematic sense. Too many scenes were just------WRONG.

The directing was awful, the editing and cinematography was terrible (it came off like a low budget schlock high school horror movie), and with a possible exception of Bella the acting was atrocious; however I don't blame the actors, they are young. They needed a competent director to guide them. If I hadn't seen Pattinson in Harry Potter, I would have thought that beautiful boy couldn't act his way out of a paper bag. The movie drew laughs from the audience that were clearly not intentional. I walked out of the theater with a couple of hundred other people who were mostly NOT happy. That included the "tweens" and adults alike. The movie ended, there was a dumbfounded silence, and everyone left. I didn't leave disappointed, or even sad...I was ANGRY.

Sorry---Hardwick blew it. The filmmakers should be ashamed of themselves.

UPDATE: Alright, I saw it again today and my review has completely changed. If I was computer savy enough I would move my review to the "in the middle" or quite possibly "loved it forum." Alas, I'm not sure how to do that, so I will just put my update here.

I saw it again this morning and brought my two sister-in-laws (they are much younger, both teenagers). It was a completely different viewing experience than at midnight. Without a theater full of teens squeeling and laughing at innapropriate places the movie was much more enjoyable. On my second viewing experience I went in with no expectations and it was MUCH better. Also, I didn't let the cheesy special effects get to me. I was completely satisfied. So for those of you who hated it the first time, I suggest giving it another chance. A different setting (one where teens aren't screaming and giggling) makes all of the difference in the world. I may just go see it again.


HERE IS MY ORIGINAL REVIEW BELOW:
The Good: I have to admit that I had a great time watching the movie. It is perhaps the most hilarious movie that I have ever seen. I have never laughed out loud in a movie so much in my entire life.

The Bad: I don't think the movie was supposed to be that funny

The Ugly: For those who haven't read Twilight, it probably wasn't funny at all...and Jasper looked strangely constipated the entire time.


I went into the movie expecting cheese. But I was expecting "The Notebook" cheese...not the Rocky Horror Picture Show cheese. This movie will be a cult classic. Teens will watch and rewatch this movie baked out of their minds for years and years to come. I am already brainstorming the drinking games that I will play when it comes out on DVD (yeah, I'm buying it on DVD).

If Catherine had the guts to make it "Twilight The Musical", then it might have been the best cult classic ever made...or the guts to have the movie make fun of itself then it might have had flashes of brilliance...nay, genius.

It was so ridiculous that in the wee hours of the morning I'm starting to think that Catherine Hardwicke is perhaps a genius. It is as if she made the film a brilliant parody of the Twilight book.

At first I wondered how they could ever make Breaking Dawn into a movie...if it is anything like Twilight, then I think it will be the best film adaptation of all the books. The cheesier the better.

As for Rob, I have to believe that he intentionally tried to be as bad as he was. Heck, anyone (and I mean anyone) could have done a better job acting. If he tried to make it over the top (as I suspect), then he was spectacular and it makes me love him even more...but, if Rob actually tried to play the role of Edward seriously...well then...I am speechless (sorry Rob...I still love you).

Don't get me wrong, I am sitting here smiling as I type this. I am not scowling. I am not angry about how the movie turned out. I do think that the movie was highly entertaining...just not in the way that I expected....not in the way it was supposed to be. Oh I loved the movie (I had a great time watching it), but for all the wrong reasons.

I do agree with those that feel Catherine Hardewick did not do a good job. I think her vision for the movie was not honest to the books. I still loved the movie but I did have trouble with not really having a meadow scene, more talking between Bella and Edward about the vampire stuff. There seemed to be no development from Bella and Edwards relationship from the first day they met till the end. They declare undying love but they don't show it. Needed to be much more between Edward and Bella. I thought all the actors were great, I think they were following the direction of a bad director.

That being said, I really think the other movies are going to learn from this and outgrow what happened here! Looking forward to them, and I still love this one, because I am a Twilight fan!

This was how I felt when I left the theater. I did like bits of the movie, however overall i was very disappointed. I do not like how Rob was directed he was not at all like I imagined him in my head. Bella was nothing like I pictured beyond appearence. Kristen has the look perfect, but the dialogue came off to me as cheesy and since when is Bella surley? She is supposed to be meak and clumbsy (she only tripped twice and was climbing around the top of a 100 foot tree with grace. I told me DH that I would probably like it more when I watch it again (the same thing happened with Queen of the Damned), but as for right now I am not impressed.

I have to say I'm quite dissapointed as well. I came in there with such high hopes, and maybe that was my downfall. I think it was just all over the place. They didn't go into enough detail with Edward and Bella. If I didn't read the book I would have been so confused. We barely see them having any sort of interaction and then BAM they're in love. I liked the scene with them playing baseball but that was about it. When it was over I was wondering if I was seeing the same movie as everyone else because I kept hearing everyone say how they loved it and it was perfect. I guess they were just dazzled by Edwards beauty because that's pretty much all most of them cared about.

I went to the midnight showing and I have to to tell you that the best part for me was sitting there for 2 hours before the movie having a great time with my 15 year old daughter. Usually it is not cool for a 15 year old to hang out with mom so that was by far the best part.
Now as far as the movie goes I am going to disagree a bit. I thought that Kristen did pretty good compared to Rob. My favorite was by far
Charlie when Bella left I wanted so bad to give Charlie a hug, he was very believable. Kristen in parts was very believable too. In all of the kissing,romance scenes,they both looked very uncomfortable, and if that is they look that they were going far then they succeceded,but that to me is not Twilight. I think all in all my 2 bigget complaints are

1 Rob,sorry I know that alot of people are going to disgree with me,but you are not Edward to me,he was born in Chicago and from the first time he opened his mouth I could not get past the accent,and I think in parts he worked to hard to cover up his accent.

2 to me this was not Twilight. I knew going in that it was not going to be as ggod as the book,but I never dreamed that it would be this bad. I truly hope that this movie makes lots of money so maybe if the do New Moon they will have a bigger better budget and they will get some real actors,sorry again Rob ,to me most of the Cullens could come back including Kristen but I need a new Edward.

Okay....i too went to the midnight showing and couldn't believe the laughter throughout most of the beginning. The forest/meadow scene was done soo incredibly poorly...from the direction-special effects-editing etc...it just was unbelievably bad. I thought it started to redeem itself a tad when the baseball scene started and we got to meet the nomads....but even that I think was straight up...LOW BUDGET! Wow, 40 million must not get you very much.
Unlike most of you....I actually thought the acting of ROB and KRISTEN was the only believable and well played out part of this movie...all of the other cullens were just mis-cast. Plain and Simple. I think they are going to ABSOLUTELY hire a new director for the 2nd movie...as i'm sure it WILL get made....but if it doesn't come across and an entirely different movie...I for one won't go see the third. I'd rather enjoy the version I have in my head from the book.

You're getting the "Cliff's Notes" version of the book. The whole thing was so rushed and they spend a great deal of time trying to explain details using exposition. It felt stunted. They didn't even leave time for dramatic pauses where there should have been dramatic pause. Like the scene where Mike Newton is waiting to ambush Bella the minute she steps out of her truck about her relationship with Edward. It was like they thought, "Oh this line was ironic in the book we have to stick it in the movie somewhere." Then the actor playing Mike delivers the line without any context to it and then walks away. They waste screen time on insignificant details that if they had just done it the way it was in the book would have taken less time and they could have had more time for other things. (The Stephenie cameo was kind of long.) If they had left the conversation in the restaurant and the drive home as it was in the book, they could have covered several of the scenes in the movie in two and it wouldn't have been so choppy. This movie has a huge built in fan base, do they really think fewer people would have gone to see it if they had made it longer and not rushed it so much?

For example, why didn't they just have Jake tell Bella the whole legend instead of having her go home, look up a book on the internet, and go buy it in Port Angeles? Also, I had a problem with the whole Port Angeles scene anyway. Edward would have never lost it like that in front of Bella. In the book, he was seething, you could feel the tension radiating from him, he would never openly threaten to "go back and rip their heads off". Part of Edward's charm is that he is always fighting to remain calm, cool, and collected. He also would have never just come out and said that he can read minds, until Bella figured it out for herself. However, that is obviously a script issue and not Rob's fault.

Edward is confident, eloquent, and extremely controlled. I think it would have helped Rob's performance if he had studied people that have Edwardian like qualities. For example, I always pictured Edward's rude behavior towards Bella in the beginning of the book to be a cross between how Mr. Darcy treated Eliza Bennet in Pride and Prejudice and a lion tracking it's prey on National Geographic. (Aren't animal exercises a basic part of any acting class?) Colin Firth pulled it off without a problem, but Rob just seemed uncomfortable. The biology class scene he looked like he was going to throw up, but didn't really come across as hostile. Rob did seem to nail it towards the end, but it took a long time to get to that point. I want to see Rob as Edward again, but I hope he takes more time to get in touch with his inner Edward. Hopefully, he'll fall in love before the next one starts filming then maybe he'll have more of an understanding with what Edward is feeling.

I didn't really care for Kirsten Stewart's portrayal of Bella either. Her look is perfect for the role, but the way she delivered her lines was like she was trying to be intense, but it just didn't work. Also, Bella is extremely perceptive and they didn't bother developing that aspect of her personality. Maybe they were trying to appease the feminists that critisized the book, but so much of the development in the story takes place in Charlie's kitchen that to replace it with a diner also hurts the development of Bella's character. You see how her relationship with her mother is, which is a detail I think they could have spent less time on, but you don't see how she also takes care of Charlie.

The scene where Bella meets the family is another that I think would have given more details in less time if they had just kept it the way it was in the book. Poor Jasper had zero character development and no mention at all of his abilities. Which I understand would be a hard thing to present in a movie, but to leave it out completely is an injustice to the story. Because it's how you find out that Jasper wants her to feel relaxed and comfortable around them and it tells you how he feels about Bella being part of his family.

The whole plot with James was covered in like 20 minutes. You see Edward's anguish when he has to suck out the venom, but not at all before that.

The laughter at places that weren't supposed to be funny was distracting, but I can understand why people thought is was funny.

I think Emmitt was perfect. Granted, he didn't have much screen time, but the actor nailed him perfectly.

I really wanted to like this movie. I'm going to go see it again today to give it a second chance and I will still buy it when it comes out on DVD.

Did anyone else have a serious problem with the way Rob/Edward manhandled Kristen/Bella???
It wasn't my interpretation of book Edward at all, who always seemed to be calmer and more in control. It def stuck in my craw.

The field trip thing was unnecessary shenanigans, as was the idea the Cullens would be cooking for Bella, so to what? Sit there and watch her eat by herself???

I agree that I was disappointed. I think they did better with the action scenes than with the dialogue. I think the screenplay wasn't true to the book or the characters in a lot of respects. The directing was awful.

They start off doing voice-overs, but that doesn't carry throughout the whole movie (I believe). I don't like the way they spliced scenes together, the beginning just seemed like one dialogue to the next without really being cohesive. The acting was marginal.

I agree that he wasn't the way I saw Edward either. This was the one thing they really needed to pull off IMO to capture the book. His cadence, his breath (where was that in the movie), the sheer perfection of him was lost. I got creepy from him, where he isn't supposed to come off as dangerous to Bella. And correct me if I'm wrong, but they never mentioned "dazzling" once.

That whole cooking scene - shouldn't have Alice "seen" that Bella already ate? The meadow scene was done all wrong, so was the Port Angeles scene, which dance they are going to (because I thought she was going to be out of town - all of sudden she goes no problem?) walking on the beach with Jacob scene, the hotel room getaway (they made it look so easy). Alice was supposed to doll her up and that dress was frumpy and she was wearing a sneaker instead of a heel?

I agree that Jasper just looked constipated or mildly surprised by everything. And Rosalie - sorry honey, but you are no Rosalie! She looked more witchy to me than like a movie star. Also, what happened to Esme - Rosalie was not going to help Bella at all and Esme just kind of disappeared.

I just felt like they could have done a much better job in general. I know movies are never as good as the books, but this was just a disappointment in so many ways.

-V

yikes....I don't know where to start. I went into the movie knowing that it would be a disappointment but I was shocked at how disappointed I was. I've seen Punky Brewster episodes that were less cheesy. Too many close-ups were the least of their problems. Directing was awful and I'm pretty sure the book was not written to be a comedy yet everyone in the theater laughed...especially during the science classroom scene. It looked cheap; everyone keeps saying that they only had 30something million (man, crappy effects must cost a fortune - let us remember "My Big Fat Greek Wedding" only cost $5million and it was really heart warming). Twilight had the quality of an after school special.

I will probably still buy the dvd (just because it is Twilight) but I'd have to say "if" they make the sequels they better choose another director. The only characters that were tolerable to watch were Eric, Alice and maybe Jacob(because of his potential), otherwise I was cringing at the performances.

I had to edit my comment and add this.. Struck me as ironic and kinda hilarious. I wont quote anything or anyone.. But I have read a few times as well as heard that the fans who loved the film brought a significant other or someone who was basically clueless about the book. During and after the film they had to keep filling the person in on what was going on... Hmmmmm.... I wonder why that was??? Im going to go with the fact it would scene jump like crazy! One min Bella and Edward are meeting and the next its the end of the movie??? People constantly say that a film will never live up to the expectations of the book... But man... This is totally different! If I would have never read the book I would have been lost as well as missed out on NUMEROUS HUGE PARTS in the book they decided to leave out for reasons like jumping from trees and what have you....

STUPID UNRELIABLE MOVIE...



I was reading through some of your comments and the one that stuck me with the best description of the movie was "Cliff Notes" That is exactly what you are getting when watching this film. Anyone who has not read the book is really going to think we are much more insane then they already assume. Yes we are ahahahaha... But they are going to think the book is really ... well lame to be exact. There was absolutely no chemistry between Bella and Edward. There was never any leading up to anything.. It skipped from one part to another without any feelings being expressed. I recall Catherine saying that they decided to add a few parts to the movie that were not in the book to make it last longer. That was def. unecessary. There was no need for that whatsoever. The movie would have been longer and much much better if she would have just kept on tact with the main story line. Capturing the feelings between Edward and Bella as well as the other characters.

Edwards personality also came across as creepy and wierd.. I would have liked to see a little more witt and arrogance to his character. Bella was more of a smart aleck and even conceded to me. I was under the impression she was shy and submissive..

The other thing I cant exactly put my finger on is how the movie was filmed. It reminded me more of like a strange version of 300 or something. I cant explain it in words.. Maybe you will understand what Im talking about? Or not..

Last thing I would like to add was how she switched up so much stuff that didnt need to be changed. Like when she was almost attacked by the 3 men. There were like 6 of them! And she could have let us experience some emotion of Bella being scared. That part was over in like a split second! And Jacob just popping up out of the trees during prom. What happened with the "cut in" while Edward and her are dancing? My impression of Jacbos father was he was very intuitive and wise. He seemed completely opposite. And I would love to see much more of Emmett and the rest of the Cullens in depth.. They were hardly in the movie at all!

VERY VERY UNIMPRESSED WITH THIS FILM... I truly hope the next one is much much better... CROSS YOUR FINGERS! I should have know Catherine was going to be a joke of a director. The fact that she casted a dark haired dark skinned girl (who is actually a good actress, just never would picture her as Rosalie" to be Rosalie... That was the first clue things were not going to match the book.. Catherine directed "Lords of Dogtown" She was casted as Tony Alvas Hispanic sister in the movie.. How the heck did Catherine think she would make a good Rosalie?? Mind boggeling... Hollywood Politics.. Im furious in all reality

mod edit for creative use of foul language

I changed my mind I love it I just had to dispell preconceived ideas.

I'm sitting here this morning after having seen the midnight showing last night, and am feeling somewhat heartbroken (I know, it's just a story, get over it, but I can't help but feeling kinda bummed out today).

I, too, was very suprised by the inappropriate moments of laughter from the audience, until I realized how cheesy and cult-movie those moments were. The audience, for the most part, was young, and the movie was showing at a theater that I don't normally go to because the general demographic of the place is pretty immature. So in a sense, I'm not suprised that there was a lot of nervous energy and talking back to the screen, but silly-girl stuff from the audience aside, the movie really didn't command their respect.

The cinematography was poor - it looked like a low budget movie. They dropped huge portions of the plotline, so that anyone who hadn't read the books probably was left in a lurch. The all important meadow scene was completely obliterated (!!!). Had they but paid more attention to that important developmental moment, Bella and Edward's story would have made more sense. You never saw her sense of wonderment - of being dazzled - and, okay yeah, I'm a purist, but THEY NEVER MENTIONED THAT SHE WAS DAZZLED BY HIM. Ever.

Special and visual effects - BAAAAD. Had they only suggested at the high-speed running, rather than really showing it, it would have been much more effective - it just looked like they were being pulled up the hill on a really fast tow-rope. They could have spent a bit more time managing the eye-color change - quite obviously colored contact lenses with no attempt at visually editing them to make them look more realistic. And poor Jacob. BAD wig. BAD BAD wig.

On the plus side, there were a few performances I really did enjoy. Charlie, Renee and the goofy science teacher were delightful, but obviously because they are more veteran actors. Jessica and Mike were very well cast as well. But as lovely as Bella and Edward looked, there was no humor to them at all. Rob Pattinson did a fine job of raising the blood pressure in the audience by a considerable margin, though, and I do appreciate him for that.

All in all, I left the theater feeling pretty let down. And for the Harry Potter fans who might have been worried that Twilight was going to steal Half Blood Prince's thunder, I think they can all have a very merry Christmas and happy new year waiting for what is going to blow this sad attempt out of the water.